Winter 1995


FEATUREFEATURE
BUSINESS WORDBUSINESS WORD
BOOK REVIEWBOOK REVIEW
ORIGINSORIGINS
FICTIONFICTION
TECHNOLOGYTECHNOLOGY
HUMOURHUMOUR
FROM THE EDITORSFROM THE EDITOR
*
*
*
*

Writer's Block




Pine cone

Business Word

*

Making the Grade — Managers' Tips for Performing Staff Evaluations

by Anton Holland

The dreaded staff evaluation—not only do employees view them with trepidation, fearing the worst, managers also wonder whether their comments are going to be met with defensiveness and derision. The evaluation should always be viewed in the most positive light: a time for reflection and renewal of creative energy and ambition.

An employee evaluation should never be viewed as an opportunity for a manager to rain negative criticism on an employee. If a significant problem exists, it should be dealt with long before a scheduled, formal review is held.

Evaluations should be used to take a look at the overall picture, to review where an employee has been in terms of professional development, and to get an idea of where he or she is headed. By doing that, you can provide your staff with valuable advice and guidance. They will be able to grow, both professionally and personally, and you will have a much more effective member of your team.

Carrying out an evaluation properly, however, is not easy. Here are a few tips on how to get the most out of the experience:

  • Check your mood at the door. The person that you are reviewing may have done something in the recent past that caused a significant problem for you to solve. If such an act is part of a trend, then you have a bigger problem to deal with. However, it is more likely an isolated incident that should not cloud your view of the past year's efforts.
  • Don't tiptoe around feelings. Despite the fact that evaluations should be positive in nature, a lot of negatives will be discussed. If you avoid mentioning them for fear of hurting a person's feelings, then you will have failed to evaluate the person's abilities. Most people can sense such avoidance and either be insulted by your lack of honesty or hurt by feelings that you don't really care to help them improve.
  • Manage the discussion. Make sure the points that you want to make are clearly understood before a discussion of reasons (or, possibly, excuses) ensues. Defensive reactions can be very difficult to deal with, and avoidance can result in misunderstood concerns and expectations.
  • Ensure that results are properly measured. Some aspects of a person's professional life can be easily quantified (e.g., how often they miss deadlines) but other aspects, such as attitude, must be tracked subjectively over time. Keep notes on specific occurrences and impressions that you can use to help someone succeed as a professional.
  • Guide rather than direct. Give advice, rather than explicit direction, on how a person can improve problem areas or achieve the goals that they set for themselves. Too much direction will discourage people from taking their own initiative and using their own creativity. You may have certain expectations for them, but as long as you have provided the right tools and assistance, it is ultimately up to the employee to make his or her career a success.
  • Don't expect employees to change overnight. Give people time to improve on their weaknesses. However, be specific about a timetable, or the change will never occur.
  • Reward results. If an employee is doing well, recognize their success in some way. In addition to remuneration, employees can be given more flexibility in the way they manage their own projects, be given more exciting challenges, and be trusted with more authority. However, ill-gotten results should not be rewarded. If a person succeeds personally by undermining the efforts of others, the whole team loses—and you as a manager have failed in your duty to help people grow in a creative and supportive atmosphere.

One thing that you should always keep in mind is that while an evaluation is carried out for professional purposes, it is a highly personal event. Be thorough and accurate, but above all, be fair in your judgement.The End

In the next instalment, watch for Anton's tips on evaluating technical writers.

 

Tell a friend

NEXT >>

 

Back to top