 |
Last Flesh: Life in the Transhuman Era
by
Christopher Dewdney
HarperCollins, Toronto
CAN $20.00
Reviewed by John Thurston, Ph.D.
During a walk downtown one evening, you pause to stand outside a theatre to look at a
crowd of well-dressed people milling at the entrance. A sleek black vehicle pulls up, and out of it steps
a tall, angular woman. … Her genetically engineered skin is bioluminescent; it literally glows in the
dark. Shimmering gold and amber ripples pulsate faintly, slipping in eddies and waves that run along her
neck and arms. Briefly, she turns to look at you, and, when she does, the setting sun catches her eyes for
an instant. Her irises are bright gold, and her pupils are elliptical, like a cat's. Over her right
shoulder hovers something that looks like a large insect. It darts over to you and hangs motionless in
front of your face, its wings humming. You realize it is a small mechanical dragonfly. It is scanning and
recording your features for the woman's security files.
Christopher Dewdney used to be one of the strangest poets writing, widely respected by other poets and
acknowledged to have a unique voice. The above scene is like a prose translation of a scene from one of his
earlier books, which were dense, obscure, evocative and full of scenarios that once would have seemed more
appropriate to speculative fiction than to poetry. Much of Dewdney remains in the above passage, except the
most important part — his poetic voice.
I have been a fan of Dewdney's for many years, but am beginning to fear that the voice that used to send
shocks of often bemused delight through me has gradually been replaced by a more prosaic and less
interesting voice that could belong to any number of other writers. His first book of prose, The
Immaculate Perception (1986), came at what now seems like the height of his poetic power and was
virtually indistinguishable in its voice and themes from his poetry. By the beginning of the nineties,
however, his poetry had begun to lose some of its flavour and The Secular Grail (1993), his second
book of prose, seemed less sharply different from what anyone else would produce.
In Last Flesh, Dewdney has openly declared his brotherhood with the writers that he has begun to
resemble: futurists and technology gurus like Freeman Dyson, Nicholas Negroponte and Canada's Derrick De
Kerckhove, who is the head of the McLuhan Institute of Technology where Dewdney is now a fellow.
Nonetheless, enough of Dewdney's mind and voice have remained his own that Last Flesh still satisfies
in a manner that cannot be found elsewhere.
The introduction to the book places it squarely in line with those writers who have made a career feeding
the growing public appetite for works that try to plumb the social and philosophical significance of the
contemporary advance of technology — especially computer technology. The transhuman era is that period of
transition between what was once assumed to be a stable human condition and the post-human condition, when
technology will allow us to take control of evolution, meld with our machines, and eventually upload our
consciousness into a digital infrastructure: "What will happen during the transhuman era is that
mind and matter will blend" (p. 5, author's emphasis). In this statement, Dewdney summarizes the
overriding thesis of his book, using the future perfect tense of futurism that is so annoying to a sceptic.
Fortunately, Dewdney is not one to let an overriding thesis get in the way of his insights. He has never
been a systematic thinker, arguing a complex and overarching thesis through a sequence of syllogistic steps.
Rather, he creates a field of thought in which individual insights can be developed without too much
explicit reference to each other. Many examples of his peculiar take on the world still shine through in
this book.
Last Flesh has 13 chapters on such diverse subjects as media culture, teledemocracy,
biotechnology, artificial intelligence, and transhuman psychology. The chapters could appear in almost any
order without harming the design of the book. Speculation on the media is grouped towards the front of the
book, on computers around the middle, and on sociology towards the end; but again, these groupings fall
within fields rather than in any sequential argument.
It does not seem accidental, however, that "Logo Sapiens: Language and Literature," a chapter
in which Dewdney returns to terrain that has fascinated him for many years, is placed in the exact centre of
the book. In earlier forays into this territory, his guides were linguists and psychologists who had little
public caché and whom he soon abandoned to explore his own sense of how language works. This chapter
revisits this ground: "Language is hard-wired into our brains; it is … part of us that is both old
and strange. Our species has co-evolved with language, though the evolution of language sometimes seems to
have its own agenda" (p. 71). But Dewdney begins this chapter by citing Marshall McLuhan, one of the
digital era's most fashionable speculators on language, and uses McLuhan to try to tie his own ideas about
language into the ideas of others about computers.
Many of Dewdney's ideas about language and computing are fascinating, particularly his ideas about how
computers may become co-authors that allow writers greater freedom to express their own creativity. He
displays the results of one of his own experiments, in which he fed his own work into a software program
with "author-syntax recognition features" and had the program recombine it. The example he
produces is interesting, but disproves his argument: it seems like Dewdney's writing, but it doesn't repay
the trust and close attention that his own writing does. It's all surface, with no meaning lurking beneath.
Glimpses of one of Dewdney's other strains appear in various places. His father was an archeologist and
Dewdney himself was self-taught in the mysteries of paleontology. He could take an extremely long view of
life on earth and humanity's limited place in that long view. He could remain detached and dispassionate
about the prospect of human extinction. Here, he writes that "[t]he advent of the posthuman era will be
poignant because humans, as we currently know ourselves, will be superseded and will pass from centre
stage" (p. 116). But in this book, Dewdney sees humanity as inevitably leading on to posthumanity,
endorsing a continuity and teleology that no paleontologist would brook.
Dewdney has always been able to combine disparate images, ideas, observations, perspectives, perceptions
and so on to achieve insights that jar the reader out of habitual modes of thought. In this book he combines
such things as Vietnam and fashion, ancient myths and modern technology, computer viruses and Tamagotchis.
One of my favourite combinatorial insights in this book is one that also shows his humour: "Plumbing
systems are another kind of humble medium. Every citizen connected to a water main lives on the banks of a
mechanical river whose waters are ingeniously forced into pipes and valves" (p. 30).
One theme that does tend to unify the book involves Dewdney's speculation on the evolution of identity
beyond what he seems to see as our undue valuing of individuality. Early in the book he writes about how
compelling he finds the Japanese collective approach to problem solving (p. 17). The idea appears under
various guises throughout and about half-way through he notes our intuitive knowledge that "the
Internet is the necessary forerunner of the collective mind" (p. 132). In the book's conclusion,
he writes: "It is not out of the question that the unique, individual human being is a transitional
evolutionary stage, an ultimately expendable aberration that is now poised at the brink of a precipitous
slide into collective consciousness. Individual human consciousness may well turn out to have been a
temporary, but necessary, detour on the road to meta-consciousness" (p. 183).
Like other parts of the book, Dewdney's writing on the hive mind is not particularly original, a value
about which he is now ambivalent. But maybe his speculations about the collective mind are partly
autobiographical. Perhaps they are signs of his awareness that his own individual voice is merging with one
strain in the collective voice. If so, I hope that he resists for awhile longer, and comes out with new work
that is more distinctly his own. Still, I would recommend the book. It still contains exhilarating material.
Even a Borg Dewdney is better than no Dewdney at all.
John Thurston holds a doctorate in English. He has written The Work of Words: The Writing of Susanna
Strickland Moodie (McGill-Queen's University Press, 1996), as well as numerous published articles on
early nineteenth-century Canadian literature.
|